Interviewers might ask questions on what you know about the company you are interviewing for. Be sure that you know the name of the company, what they are and the job description of the job you are applying to. It is important that you relate your answers to what the company is looking for. Read up on helpful job interview articles and join email courses that will provide you with a way to leave a good impression with the employer.
While it may seem obvious, one of the most important interview tips is to arrive at the interview neat, ready and appropriate. Have your attire sensible to the company you are interviewing for. Also, bring a portfolio with copies of your resume and a pen and paper for note taking. Timeliness Be sure that you are always on time for the interview. Timeliness would mean being around minutes early for the interview.
Being too early or too late would be showing that you do not respect the time of an interviewer. Be sure to arrive at the time you are allotted to. Knowing the CORRECT Answers to Interview Questions This is arguably the most important of all the interview tips I have given you in that if you can ace the questions the interviewer will drill you with, you will probably ace the interview.
You will want to find a list of common interview questions, and ensure that you have at least a rough idea of how to answer them so that you can give great natural answers to your interviewer on the big day.
However, this can indeed be difficult especially if you are a new candidate or have not interviewed for a number of years and it my be necessary to practice with a friend. When pitching your idea to a producer you should be succinct and engaging. For further discussion it is good to have a media kit also called press kit. It is a collection of information about a person, product, company or event sent to the media as a promotional tool. A media kit is a folder containing the basic facts about why you and your topic will make an interesting show for the audience.
It is not as much about you as much as it is about what you can do. There are no set standards for what should be in the kit, but it should be written from the point of view of: "Here is what I can do for your audience and it will make your life easier". You can write a kit yourself, or you can assign this task to a PR firm. It may contain office locations, number of employees, key clients, number of awards won, etc.
Let the listeners know how what you offer will solve their problems, make their life easier, make them look good, etc. In essence, what's in it for them and why should they care. It is good publicity, as well as a proof to a producer that your story is worth telling. A typical American producer may go over 50 press kits a day, so make sure yours is one that stands out.
There are few things you need to do after the show. First, send thank you letters to your contact person at the radio station and to the show host. Staying in touch with producers and hosts is important if you want to establish good media relationships.
Later you may decide to go on this show or this radio station again, and it is important that the radio people remember you. If you leave a good impression on the radio producers and hosts, they may call you on a show again.
Second, immediately ask for a letter of recommendation from the radio host. This letter will be very useful to promote your business in the future. Third, if you feel that you didn't perform that well, or if you found out that you didn't achieve your sales targets, talk to the radio show host, the producer, or some other people on the radio to find out what they think about your performance and what in their opinion was lacking.
Fourth, if you got some calls from sponsors or potential business partners during the show, get in touch with them in the next few days after the show. You may want to send them an email reminder about yourself, summarizing the positive moments of communication during the show.
The most efficient way would be to make a phone call to the person you talked during the show. Fifth, share your experience with colleagues so they may contact the station for an interview and share their contact information with you.
The bottom line is that you should do as much networking as possible with both radio people and business connections to establish good reputation, stay in their memories and exploit the new business and promotional opportunities, as well as you should understand how well you performed to improve your message in the future and keep the parts that everyone liked.
Tuesday, September 28, Proper Interview Techniques. Wednesday, September 8, Non verbal interview techniques for children. By identifying when such verbal and non-verbal signs of deception are present we I didn't ask this man if he was married with children or to comment on the Do you have any advice for other non-verbal children and their Permission to republish Encouraging Nonverbal Kids to Talk in Most of your communication with other Recognizing and understanding the nonverbal communication in children is crucial to You spend a lot of time preparing to answer interview questions and Effects of interviewer's nonverbal behaviors on children's perceptions The effects of interviewing techniques on young children's responses to Monday, September 6, Media interview techniques.
The next few pages should give you a reasonable understanding of how A basic understanding of a reporter's job and a few interviewing techniques can increase your Techniques of Control. Quantify your info and tie it together giving the The best way to learn how to handle media interviews is with a professional coach in a simulated TV studio.
Saturday, September 4, Interview techniques question professional. Interview Questions with Job interview, interview questions and answers, job interview tips, interview technique, sample interview questions, job interview questions, ISC Professional provides interview skills courses,one-to-one interview skills coaching and a Includes a comprehensive bank of interview questions.
Free interview questions and answers and job Interview tips and strategies. Common interview questions and excellent interview answers, This free site is full of great job interview tips and techniques. Learn about how to prepare Thursday, September 2, Interview techniques for investigations.
Cognitive Interviewing. Cognitive interviewing techniques have been used by investigators for years. However, the Law enforcement personnel know the process of investigative interviewing very well. The interview is often an integral part of an investigation. Monday, August 30, Homeland security interview techniques. By Doug Wicklander and Dave A good interviewing technique is to restate what you just heard back to the Saturday, August 28, Executive job interview techniques. Tips and techniques for answering common interview questions, making a good first impression Communication skills training courses, presentation skills programmes, public speaking, leadership development and executive Each job interview has it's own strategies and particular points one should be aware of.
Thursday, August 26, Entj interview techniques. Whether you're applying for an entry-level position with a You don't need to be an ENTJ personality to go it alone At home things can start getting messy but I have my coping techniques. Unit, Advanced Techniques, 4, PM Tuesday, August 24, Depression interview questions and techniques. I have to write an essay on the great depression. Software technology Interview Questions and articles Unlike other techniques, Kreg Jig requires no glue, no complicated math, and no small army of clamps to make Frequently asked interview questions and answers And thanks again Reader Questions.
An Interview with Lidia Zylowska, M. Sunday, August 22, Clinical interview techniques. Most often used by clinical interviewers; patient is asked direct questions in Advantages of the Clinical Interview. Characteristics of Good Interviewing Skills Fundamentals of technique Clinical interview: psychiatric history and mental status.
This article discusses clinical interviews with respect to insanity Ending the Interview Take notes. Free Updates! Medley updates his how-to handbook of job interviewing techniques, emphasizing skills and strategic planning. Wednesday, August 18, Non verbal interview techniques. It could be what clinches the job offer Here are some interview techniques which elucidate the power of nonverbal signals.
Making an eye contact with your interviewer is very How do you ready come across? Using proper interview techniques is particularly important for Communication is verbal and non-verbal. Martin's Press. Yzerbyt, V. London: Sage Publications, pp. Zulawski, D. Download references. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Reprints and Permissions. Expert Evidence 7, — Download citation.
Issue Date : September Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search SpringerLink Search. Abstract In real life, suspects are often subjected to repeatedinterrogations. Google Scholar Allwood, C. Google Scholar Ambady, N. Google Scholar Anderson, C. Google Scholar Baddeley, A. Google Scholar DePaulo, B.
See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details. The SlideShare family just got bigger. Home Explore Login Signup. Successfully reported this slideshow. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Upcoming SlideShare. Like this presentation? Why not share! Finding the Truth: Interview and In Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end.
WordPress Shortcode. Next SlideShares. Download Now Download to read offline and view in fullscreen. Download Now Download Download to read offline. Health Easy Peasy Follow.
The interrogation. Police suspect interview questions. Police promotion interview questions. Advanced Interview and Interrogation. Micro expressions. The Lie Detector. Tommy Seah Interviewing techniques and Fraud Investigation. This is difficult and requires total concentration so that you give yourself every opportunity to encode everything the person says, not just that which you may think is important.
This is why writing brief notes throughout the interview is vital. They act as prompts, as cues for probing further, and help you structure an accurate and comprehensive written statement or summary.
Scripts Interviewers also use scripts to assist the processing of the large amount of information received during an interview. These scripts are our own version of what typically happens in the sort of crime being investigated, the category or type of witness and the process of interviewing.
It may be based on your previous experience with other investigations of a similar nature or from a briefing about the incident. To guide the processing of information, you may unwittingly over-emphasise the information that you receive that supports your script, while distorting or ignoring information that is inconsistent.
Other memory filters A number of additional filters can influence the memory of an investigative interviewer including: Page 33 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued From your knowledge of this investigation and previous investigations, you may develop your own hypothesis about what happened and be particularly attentive to information that fits.
As the interviewer you will be conscious of the ingredients required to prove an offence or to counter the defences to an offence. Confirmatory bias Confirmatory bias is when information is interpreted so that it confirms what you already know, or think you know.
Accordingly a complete account may not be elicited from the interviewee as the interviewer believes he or she has all the information that can be provided. In these circumstances, the interviewer may over-control the interview and use inappropriate questions. The resulting account will be a reflection of the interviewer's preconceived ideas rather than an accurate and complete account of what the interviewee knows.
In this situation not only do interviewers only hear what they want to hear but interviewees may change what they say in an attempt to please the interviewer. The last two options are unacceptable, interviewers must make every attempt to include and explore all contradictory evidence in both the interview and any subsequent written statement.
Question strategy The type of questioning you use can influence the information that the interviewee discloses. You may subconsciously ask questions in a manner that encourages the interviewee to provide answers that support your confirmatory bias.
Interviewing requires intense concentration Trying to remember an incident completely can be hard work. If someone gives you information that supports what you think has happened it is tempting to be satisfied and stop probing further. It is so much easier to use your previous knowledge, stereotypes, prejudices, beliefs, assumptions or expectations of what happened to save the effort of going further.
Certainly this may be what often happens, but this process leads to inaccurate information and evidential problems further down the judicial process. Accurate memory recall relies upon witnesses making the effort to recall as much as they can without not short-cutting the process.
Unfortunately, many people do short-cut the process and one of the skills of a good interviewer is to prevent that process. Page 34 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Standardisation Unless the interview has been recorded electronically, once you have encoded and stored the information you will have to recall and transpose it into a written statement.
Ordinary forgetfulness will affect this process. This may result in a statement that is different from what was actually said. Remember, given the limitations of memory, it is natural for an interviewee to be genuinely mistaken or confused about what they have witnessed. It is your role to help the person remember everything they possibly can so as to establish the truth not to distort information so it supports a preconceived theory.
In one study by McLean 16 written statements were taken by experienced investigators. The process was also tape recorded at the same time. It was found that statements had important omissions with evidentially significant detail missing. Not one contained all the relevant information. On average, fourteen items of relevant information were omitted per interview.
Further, in court witnesses will give evidence according to their memory. If this is inconsistent with their statement they can be open to criticism under cross- examination by defence counsel. In an attempt to undermine their credibility and reliability they may be blamed for the inconsistencies.
Page 35 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Listening Introduction International research reveals that investigators will ask an interviewee for an account and then, on average, interrupt the interviewee within 7. New Zealand research produced a similar result, with the average interruption occurring within 6. One of the most important communication skills is the ability to listen, a skill that many people have to develop.
It is easy to jump to conclusions and assume that we know what another person is experiencing or needs. In everyday life we are often selective in our listening and filter out what we think is non-essential information. However when interviewing for evidence it is vital that interviewers are able to listen effectively.
Active listening Listening is not a passive activity. You must actively process the information that is being provided by the interviewee. The components of active listening are detailed below. Concentrate Be attentive to the interviewee and concentrate on what they are saying. Focus on what you are doing.
It is useful to take notes that can act as a memory aid but do not allow this to affect the flow of the interview. Comprehend It is important that you gain a full and accurate understanding of what is said and that you identify what are reported facts and reports of opinion. Consider how the information fits in with the information you already have and how it affects your interview plan. Sustain Reinforce your commitment to giving the interviewee adequate time and space to talk.
Active listening should encourage interviewees to tell you how they feel about an incident. Use attentive silence and do not interrupt refer to the section below on 'Techniques for effective listening' for tools to assist with this process. Use listening strategies A variety of strategies can be used to encourage the interviewee to recall and reveal information. Using non-biasing behaviours to reinforce the interviewee communicating is part of active listening.
Listening strategies that can be used are detailed below. Page 36 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Listening strategies Showing you want to listen It is important that you convey to the interviewee that you want to listen to their account.
The following will help you achieve this. This will convey the perfectly natural expectation that you wish them to talk to you. This process has benefits for you. They speak loudly in their attempt to have people listen to their story. When asking a question, they often answer it themselves. These people are only interested in their own agenda, having poor social and communication skills.
During an interview it is the interviewee who has all the important information. You should give the interviewee their turn to talk and the time to do so.
This helps them to feel part of a conversation and encourages talking. They must be given the opportunity to have their say. In later phases you will need to listen more as you endeavour to analyse the information being given. Conversation topics It is important to let the interview flow naturally from one topic to the next.
By listening effectively to the account you will encourage the natural progression of the conversation. It takes a great deal of mental effort on the part of the interviewee to recall something in detail.
Changing topics prematurely before the interviewee has exhausted the detail they can or wish to give is distracting and counter-productive. Wait until a more appropriate time in the interview before asking questions about another topic. Finish each topic before moving on. If something comes to mind during one topic that is not immediately relevant, jot it down so that it can be raised later and is not forgotten.
During the Engage and Explain phase you will be providing a lot of information and must actively strive to bring the interviewee into the conversation. In the Account phase, the interviewee should provide you with information and will therefore do most of the talking. Encouragement cues Nodding of the head or saying 'yes' to encourage the witness to keep talking is likely to be seen as the wrong sort of encouragement by defence counsel.
Particularly if that part of the evidence is damming to their case. In those circumstances, the defence would have a good chance of having the interview excluded from evidence and therefore we need to avoid giving this type of 'positive' feedback. It tells the speaker you are interested in what is being said and that you do not wish to interrupt.
Use sparingly as overuse may result in the opposite effect and interrupt the interviewee and cause them to think that you do not believe them or that you want them to pause so you can say something. Insincere use of these techniques when you are not really listening should be avoided as they can easily be detected by the interviewee.
Echo probing This is the process of repeating a phrase or the last few words of a reply. Its effect is to act like a question to prompt elaboration of a specific point and invites the other person to continue speaking about the subject. It can be particularly effective when a person who has been talking freely, stops speaking. It shows that you are listening and encourages the person to continue.
It should not be used too quickly or where the witness is still thinking indicated by looking away , echoing can easily be an interruption and counterproductive. It is better used as a paraphrase effectively asking a new question using the words used by the witness. Mindless repetition of words and overuse will have the opposite effect to what you intended and can make it seem that you are not really listening, or make you look foolish. You should take care that any emphasis you place on repeated words does not unintentionally indicate any judgemental feelings about the other person.
Summarising Use summarising strategically when interviewing by repeating in summary what the interviewee has said. This can be done both during the account and at the end of the interview. Use summarising with witness interviews to ensure you understand correctly what they have told you and can prepare an accurate written statement. Summarise back to them using their own words using a clarification seeking approach.
Explain to the witness that they need to correct you if any part of your summary is inaccurate. Careful accurate summarising is vital as inaccurate summarising can contaminate the person's memory. Use of silence and pauses Silence in an interview can be unnatural and uncomfortable for both interviewer and interviewee alike. We all have a natural urge to fill pauses and gaps. Having asked a question, pause so that the interviewee may process what you are asking, access their memory, and formulate an answer.
When people concentrate hard, they remain silent and normally focus on a neutral space such as the floor or ceiling.
By not interrupting this process you may obtain that valuable extra piece of information. Breaking eye contact can usually encourage this to occur. As the interviewer, wait until the interviewee has finished answering the question before you formulate your next question. Whilst they are answering your question you should be actively listening to what they are telling you, not thinking of the next question.
It is acceptable and often beneficial to pause between their answer and your next question — they expect you to act professionally and doing so involves both active listening and asking thoughtful questions. Silence can also be a powerful tool to use when wanting to prompt an interviewee to speak.
After putting a question to a person who is reluctant to answer, or after receiving a reply which needs further elaboration, consider remaining silent. As people normally speak in turns, and your silence is the cue that it is still their turn, the interviewee will find it difficult not to do so. Finally, remember that no investigator may try to obtain answers to questions by the use of oppression, so use silence with discretion. For example, when a person has said something that you think is patently untrue it can be very effective to stay silent and see what happens.
However this might be viewed as unfair if overused. Page 39 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Questioning Introduction All members of the public have a duty to help investigators to prevent crime and identify offenders.
This is a civic rather than a legal duty. When you are trying to discover whether, or by whom, an offence has been committed, you are entitled to question any person from whom you think useful information can be obtained refer to the Chief Justice Note Guideline 1. Most people will assist your investigations readily, but if a witness is unwilling to answer questions about a particular offence or incident no action can normally be taken. The exception to this rule is when there is a legal obligation to provide information e.
Basic rules of questioning The type of questioning you use in an investigative interview is vital. An outline of the basic rules is as follows: Vocabulary The language used should be simple, unambiguous and jargon-free so all parties understand what is meant.
Relevance Each question must have a purpose and not be used to fill time. A well-prepared interview plan accompanied by listening carefully to everything that is said should eliminate repetitive questioning. Pace The interviewee must be allowed time to understand the question, think what knowledge they have of the matter, formulate their answer and deliver it. Interruptions Interviewers must learn to curb any tendency to interrupt the interviewee as this will break the person's train of thought and stop the flow of information, potentially preventing important facts from emerging.
Control If a suspect interviewee strays from the point, direct him or her back firmly but tactfully e. However this 're- direction' back to topics by the interviewer should be used sparingly with witnesses as they will often move to information that is readily available i. In those circumstances we need to ask questions that are compatible with what they are thinking about. Once we have done that, we can move back to the unfinished issue or topic.
Appropriate questions There are a variety of different types of questions you can use as an investigative interviewer. The types you use should be those that will elicit the most accurate, complete and reliable information. How the first question of the interview is worded is vital to the usefulness or otherwise of any subsequent information provided by the interviewee. Open-ended questions An open-ended question is the best type of question and is framed to encourage the interviewee to provide a detailed answer.
Page 40 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued The resulting account will have better quality and quantity of information than if other types of questions were used. Open questions should be used as much as possible during the interview and your full attention is required to observe and listen to everything. TEDS Learning to ask open questions is a skill that will take practice.
Asking questions using the words represented by the mnemonic TEDS will assist with this process: Tell T ell me Explain E xplain Describe D escribe Show S how me TEDS act as instructions rather than questions and encourage the interviewee to provide a full and detailed account of what they know.
Example of TED style questions : ' Tell me everything that happened Explain what you mean by this? Probing questions Probing or closed questions are ones that allow only a relatively small range of responses, usually a word or short phrase.
These are the second best type of question but should only be used when an attempt to use an open question has failed. They can be used to get specific detail or to probe information given from an open question. This should be avoided as it causes the interviewee to be passive, interrupts their concentration and affects memory recall. Closed questions are also more likely to provide incorrect responses than they would with open questions. Page 41 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Instead, you should always start the interview using open TEDS type questions giving the interviewee an opportunity to provide a full account.
When open questions are no longer fruitful the 5WH type questions can be used to probe their account for any details omitted. Inappropriate questions There are a number of types of questions that should be avoided as they may affect the quality and quantity of the information given.
The ultimate closed questions seek to elicit a 'yes' or 'no' answer, these may start with 'Did you…? This type of question will encourage very short answers. Repeated requests for short answers will quickly train the witness to respond with short answers and can reduce the responses to following open questions and TEDS.
These types of questions are generally used as a last resort when all else fails. Leading and misleading questions Leading and misleading questions imply the answer or assume facts that are likely to be in dispute. Leading questions imply the correct response whereas misleading imply an incorrect response. The information you provide may also be incorrect and reduce the quality of the investigation and the evidence.
Page 42 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Forced-choice questions These types of questions leave the interviewee with a small number of alternatives to choose from. There is no guarantee that any of the alternatives are the correct option. The interviewee may guess the answer by selecting one of the options given, even if they know the correct option is not provided. You should never use these types of questions. Multiple questions Asking more than one question at once is a multiple question and can lead to confusion.
Firstly, the interviewee does not know which part of the question to answer and must choose between them. This results in either part of the sub-question being unanswered or additional cognitive loading on the interviewee who is trying to remember the sub- questions at the same time as retrieving information to answer each sub-question.
Secondly, when an answer is given, the interviewer does not know which question was answered. Make sure you ask only one question at a time.
What was he wearing? Did he have a jacket on? Complex questions Avoid using grammatically complex questions. They are confusing and reduce the confidence of the interviewee.
Where possible, keep your language simple and at the level used by the interviewee. What do you say to that? This is especially true for people who have English as a second language. Opinion type questions Avoid asking questions that include a personal statement or opinion. Page 43 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Police jargon such as "decamped" is not understood by everyone. Use everyday language that is unlikely to make someone feel inferior or be misunderstood.
Page 44 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued This involves the following phases: Phase Action 1 Planning and preparation: Review available information and establish interview objectives. Time should be spent on each phase but no rigid boundaries exist between the phases. The amount of time on each phase should be determined by the seriousness of the offence. PEACE is a professionally validated, evidence based framework for investigative interviewing. The PEACE framework provides the structure for all investigative interviews whether with witnesses or suspects.
The term interview structure recognises that the interview is something we build or create. As the interviewer, you are responsible for the planning and conduct of the interview.
A well-planned and carefully conducted interview has a good chance of obtaining complete, accurate and reliable information. Some lines are solid, indicating that there is a natural forward movement from one phase to the next.
For example, explaining the purpose of an interview is a task that may require repetition and redefinition throughout the interview. Similarly Closure is linked back to Account, Probing and Challenge with a dotted line.
The interviewee may recall some new information or may wish to test your memory of what they have previously said. It is important to remember that there are no rigid boundaries between the phases and flexibility is required throughout. The PEACE framework for every interview For every interaction requiring you to obtain information, whether conducting a vehicle turnover or interviewing a suspect for a homicide, the PEACE framework can be applied.
Time must always be spent on each of the phases and the type of interaction will determine how much time you spend. Planning and preparation : you must decide why you are stopping the vehicle, where is the best place to pull over, whether you will ask the driver to get out of the vehicle or remain inside, what you will say to them.
Engage and explain : you will spend time introducing yourself to the driver and explaining to them why you asked them to stop.
Account : you will ask them why they were speeding, show or explain the evidence of the recorded speed and discuss their speeding with them.
Closure : you will either issue a ticket or give them a warning depending on the decision you have made and explain why you have made that decision. You may give them your card and ask them to contact you if they require any advice or further information. You will reflect on your interaction with that person and consider what went well, what did not and how you might be able to deal with the situation better next time.
Page 46 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued The models known as 'free recall', 'cognitive interviewing' and 'conversation management' are examples of these and will be detailed in this doctrine. These models are used during the actual interview process so affect the engage and explain, account and closure stages of PEACE.
Time taken to conduct interviews Learning to use the PEACE framework with the free recall or conversation management interview models will take practice. Initially you may find that your interviews take longer as you are still learning the skills. Once your skills have developed you will become more efficient at interviewing and find that any extra time you do spend interviewing will be due to the increased quantity and quality of information you generate.
You will find that by asking the right questions and allowing the interviewee to give their recall of events without interrupting is a more efficient way of producing a complete and accurate account than continuous questioning. Electronically recording suspect interviews will also save you the time consuming task of writing down everything that is said in the interview.
In addition, higher quality interviews will save you time later during the prosecution process. The PEACE framework is flexible and you will develop the ability to tailor the interview so that the amount of time spent matches the investigation needs. Page 47 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Planning and preparation Introduction This section will detail the procedures involved in the first phase of a PEACE interview: planning and preparation.
Summary How much time should be spent on planning and preparation? All officers should spend time planning and preparing for an interview.
The amount of time will depend on the circumstances of the case - it will vary from 5 minutes to weeks. What should be covered when planning and preparing for an interview? Why plan and prepare? Each factor should be considered in relation to the others when preparing for an interview. The circumstances of each case will determine the importance of each variable and how they impact on one another. For example, when and where the interview takes place may be affected by the need for a nominated adult or an interpreter to be present.
The amount of time you spend planning and preparing for an interview may vary from minutes to weeks depending on features such as the time available and the severity of the offence. Regardless of the pressure you are under you should always spend a minimum of five to ten minutes planning and preparing except in those circumstances where you are stopping a car or attending an urgent event. Whatever time restraints you are under, always make time to plan your interview.
What sources you use will be dependant on the time available and seriousness of the offence. Use these sources to address the different categories detailed below. Interview objectives When interviewing suspects you should always read and analyse all information available about the investigation before starting the interview.
For an enquiry file this translates into reviewing all file documents including statements previously made by the interviewee and other persons , reports, jobsheets, notebook entries, other documentation, examining any relevant exhibits and, if the circumstances warrant it, a visit to the scene. This is not necessary when interviewing witnesses as minimising the information the interviewer has can minimise the possibility of accidentally giving information to the witness and influencing their evidence.
If you are reacting to information provided by the Communication Centre this phase may merely involve obtaining the full details over the radio and ascertaining any further details from the informant. Knowledge of the incident and details of what was reported may indicate whether an interviewee is likely to be co-operative or hostile, use this to risk assess the situation but try not to pre-judge the interviewee's response.
This will help ensure that you obtain relevant and useful information from the interview. With all the information established so far, decide on the purpose of the interview and set objectives.
The main objective will always be to obtain complete, accurate and reliable information from the interviewee. Every interview must be prepared with the needs of the investigation in mind, but these objectives must not be met at any cost. You must behave ethically, fairly and reasonably.
Page 49 of 76 Investigative interviewing doctrine, Continued Investigatively important topics With both witnesses and suspects there are topics that you will need to explore for the purposes of the investigation - these are called investigatively important topics.
0コメント